Due to the fact there does not seem like any "Formal" Load Data available for this Load, can several of you present a starting point with this combination and issues to think about when Doing the job this Load up?
Ballistically, Hodgdon H4831 SC Powder is the precise copy of H4831. Bodily, it has a shorter grain sizing, thus, the designation SC or shorter cut. The shorter, more compact kernels enable the powder to circulation with the powder measures more easily, helping to reduce the frequent slicing of granules.
It's most likely that no more dialogue is needed, where scenario we advise beginning a whole new thread. If even so you feel your reaction is required you can however accomplish that.
243, and several of the loads I have began with consist of, you guessed it, H-4831sc. This time I am going to shoot the IMR7828 loads very first, followed by the W780 loads just so there won't be any surprises in the event the H-4831sc loads clearly show a shotgun sample! Who is aware, I just may possibly discover a use for it after all.
Yup or it will not work very well. And Considering that the OP provides a load employing Varget I'd check out to seek out somebody to trade with. Could possibly come up with a win win problem.
It's possible that no even further discussion is required, wherein scenario we advocate commencing a different thread. If even so you're feeling your reaction is needed you are able to still do this.
If there's no load data it is for the reason that this powder will not be appropriate for this cartridge. Usually 1 won't discover a person powder to fit all cartridges, and the relatives of cartridges with the h4831sc particular powder (4831SC) that you're inquiring about doesn't do the job.
Like claimed over, exact same things. Everything differs is the size in the kernels. I did listen to someplace that they are going to only make the SC Down the road. I have no idea if which is accurate or not but would make sense to me. I exploit SC due to the fact which is what I found in the eight lb jug and it works.
At this time working with IMR 4831 in a very 300WSM, and find out the H4831sc is a popular choice for this caliber and yields a little bit more velocity. In addition to it getting small Minimize, precisely what is the main difference in these two powders, and may I change to H4831sc?
Why would I mention this? What precisely is my place? I'm undecided that there's a actual valid issue in addition to precisely what is well-known with most hasn't been well known with me in the least in these situation. Do I just Possess a powder jinx or something? Only to teach you how nuts I actually am, tomorrow I am vary screening a mates new .
If there is no load data it is actually due to the h4831sc fact this powder just isn't suitable for this cartridge. Ordinarily one will likely not discover one powder to fit all cartridges, and the relatives of cartridges with the particular powder (4831SC) that you'll be asking about doesn't do the job. Click to extend...
It is most likely that no further dialogue is needed, during which case we recommend setting up a completely new thread. If on the other hand you feel your reaction is necessary you could even now achieve this.
Many of the old Lyman data just stated IMR 4831, which was surplus armed forces powder and now more recent mfg as H4831.
I sawed 1 in fifty percent to view how thick the jackets ended up, they usually were being conveniently 2 times as thick as a fifty-grain hollow point was. Ditto for the sixty four-grain Power Stage, as these bullets are constructed for deer, not prairie canines or woodchucks. You now know every little h4831sc thing I learn about the 22-250 and slow-burning powders, and I don't know anything at all concerning the 223. I question that you are going to get any place with that cartridge and 4831, but allow us to know how it goes.